Producer's Desk — March, 2008 — politics

What is “The Producer’s Desk”?

As you know, Richard Land LIVE! is a once-a-week broadcast. This is fine and good, but some of us are–let’s be honest–borderline ‘addicts’ when it comes to reading the news and blogs. Fear not! This is where the Producer’s Desk fills that Sunday-through-Friday void when RLL is not broadcasting.

Subscribe to this feed in your news-reader or email and read what Richard and the Richard Land LIVE! producers are reading throughout the week! (Hint: It may inform what you hear on the Saturday live broadcast.)

We hope you enjoy!

-The Producers

If you come across something in your online reading you think is worthy of posting here, send us the link and your comments through the Contact form in the right column of this page!

(This is a separate subscription from the RLL Podcast found in the right-hand column of this page.)

Tuesday reading

posted by Producer on 03.18.2008

Topics: conservatism, immigration, mainstream media, politics, religion, values voters,

posted by Producer on 03.14.2008

Topics: politics, racial reconciliation,

Richard’s latest post at Casting Stones

posted by Richard Land on 03.03.2008

Topics: islamic extremism, politics, war,

America’s National Security At Risk - Richard Land

“Americans are less safe today from terrorists than two weeks ago. On Feb. 16, a critical law authorizing our intelligence community to monitor foreign terrorists’ communications expired… Liberals in Congress appear more interested in empowering the lawyers to sue the telecommunications companies than they are in providing for the security of United States citizens…” - Richard Land

Continue reading America’s National Security At Risk...

posted by Producer on 02.28.2008

Topics: evangelicals, politics, election,

Dr. Richard Land was featured on NPR’s Morning Edition Thursday February 28, 2008.

Excerpt:

“It seems to me that when you say to someone, ‘Well, you’re too narrowly focused on abortion and same-sex marriage.’ That’s like telling [the Rev. Martin Luther] King he was too narrowly focused on racial reconciliation and racial justice,” Land says.

“If you have a pro-life candidate running for the Republicans … and he’s running against someone who is pro-choice and who is running on a party platform that has never met an abortion they couldn’t at least live with — if they didn’t like — you’re not going to see a lot of movement among evangelicals when it comes to presidential elections,” Land says.

NOTE: Producer’s Desk finds the heading of NPR’s Web entry amusing: “Conversations with Conservatives.” Does NPR also have entries under the heading “Conversations with Liberals?” Just curious. At least they are “conversing with” conservatives.

What we’re reading on Monday

posted by Matthew Hawkins on 02.25.2008

Topics: mainstream media, politics, election, primaries,

Richard Land and the Richard Land Live! staff are reading the following articles today…

“A newspaper cannot begin a story about the all-but-certain Republican presidential nominee with the suggestion of an extramarital affair with an attractive lobbyist 31 years his junior and expect readers to focus on anything other than what most of them did. And if a newspaper is going to suggest an improper sexual affair, whether editors think that is the central point or not, it owes readers more proof than The Times was able to provide. The stakes are just too big.” - Clark Hoyt: Public Editor, NYT
“These superdelegates—disproportionately middle-aged (that’s being charitable), white, and male—are free to vote their “consciences,” without regard to what throngs of Democratic primary or caucus voters in their districts or states may have done.” - Richard Land

posted by Richard Land on 02.22.2008

Topics: politics, democrats, election,

“It appears that the superdelegates are a symbol of liberal elitism. “Yes, you can vote for the candidate of your choice,” but if the people chose unwisely, the party elders, fulfilling the role of elitist “nanny” state, will decide what is “best for the people.” ”

Read the rest at Casting Stones on Beliefnet.com.

posted by Richard Land on 02.12.2008

Topics: culture, politics, election,

“It now appears almost certain that the presidential contest in 2008 will be between Sen. McCain and either Sen.Clinton or Obama. I have been asked on many occasions which contest I would prefer….The country does not need yet another round of that bitter debate in which no one wins and everyone loses…”

Read on at Casting Stones (Beliefnet.com)

Page 7 of 7 pages : ‹ First  < 5 6 7